Gasfield official ‘Ayani’ murder is not an accident, sensational-proper investigation demand!

thedailymorningsun.com
published 30 October, Wednesday, 2024 23:35:30
Gasfield official ‘Ayani’ murder is not an accident, sensational-proper investigation demand!

Photo-collected.
Special Representative //


In the case of Sylhet (Haripur) gasfield officer Moinul Hossain Ayani (57) killed in a road accident in Jaintapur, Sylhet, SI (retd) Md. Yunus Ali of Highway Police has filed the final report of the matter as murder, after filing the final report in the court, shocking information has started to come out. This has created a commotion in the local area.

According to the locals in the field investigation, a person stole the bed of Azad Khan’s house on May 25, 2024. When the distance between Azad Khan and Sohail Ahmed family increased based on that incident, the farce started in the name of arbitration meeting. Ayani was a mentor of Gramya Salish in that meeting. Also, UP members of that area and many others tried to solve the theft issue. But while the cruel irony of fate was going on, Ayani lost his life in a road accident last night on June 13, 2024 around 12:30 PM. The excitement began. On the day and night of the incident Ayani was taken to a private Ibn Sina Hospital in Sylhet without being taken to a government hospital for treatment. But Ayani breathed his last on the way. The next day, on June 15, Ayani was killed in a road accident, and the police filed a case against Umar Ali, son of Tahir Ali of Umanpur village, at Jaintapur Model Police Station. whose case is no-06.

On the other hand, it is a mysterious fact that the Jaintapur Model Police Station did not prepare any proper report of Ayani from the accident site. At one point Sylhet-Tamabil Highway Police Ayani rushed to Sylhet Sobhanighat Ibn Sina Hospital after receiving the news of the deceased. Highway police SI Yunus Surthal made a report ignoring the police station there, but did not take any proper legal action for postmortem of Ayani’s body. Judge Mia staged the drama and continued the murder of the whole incident. That too depends on only a few witnesses. Because the highway policeman knew that cars can be impounded under the Road Transport Act, but the matter is not under their jurisdiction but outside the entire law. Finally, using the case of Jaintapur Model Police Station as a shield, he made some officers as witnesses and continued to call the matter as murder under section 161. Later, the court took the testimony of several persons under section 164. Later, as extensive police investigation and collection of evidence was necessary, the court directed the Jaintapur Model Police Station to revive Jaintapur GR 83/2024 within three days and also to treat the case as a report.

On the other hand, in the case of last June 15, DI pickup driver Umar Ali was made the only defendant, but later, highway policeman Yunus Tan mentioned the names of 4 more people in his final report. They are Hormuz Ali (42), son of Muharram Ali, Taher Ali (45), son of Siddeq Ali, Yusuf Ali (22), son of deceased Abdur Rahim and Muhammad Ali (42), son of Siddeq Ali.
During the investigation of SI Yunuch, it is also seen that all the persons whom he has testified against the defendants are involved in untimely assault cases, house breaking and looting or on the contrary, they are defendants in the case of the defendants. In other words, about seventy percent of the people of Umanpur village are standing for the influential people Azad Khan and Ayani. Their main objective is to overthrow this family. Even after knowing these things, Yunus has confirmed a related source that Judge Mia created drama without accepting any neutral testimony. Only Tainoy took statements of witnesses under Section 161 of SI Yunus before informing the court but for some mysterious reason he did not collect any call list.

A recent review of a preliminary information report dated October 3 shows that 4 more people have been accused in the case. As time goes on, the weight of the accused is getting heavier. The accused are Md. Sohail Ahmad (Barek-22), son of Samsur Uddin of Umanpur village, Subed Ali (21), son of Taher Ali, Muharram Ali (60), son of Jabid Ali and Samsur Islam (54), son of Abdur Rahman.
In the first case, car driver Umar Ali was the only defendant, but with the passage of time, the line of defendants is getting longer. Umar Ali has been accused in several charges by the state. Later 4 more people were accused in the trap of SI Yunus. Nazmul Hossain is the brother of the deceased
(Emdad)’s trap has made 4 more accused. Even so, the process of adding accused to the name of the case has started. Meanwhile, although Ayani’s body has been exhumed and sent to the morgue for post-mortem, it remains unclear whether it was a murder or a road accident.

When contacted on the mobile phone of Highway Police SI Yunuch, he said that after the court took note of the matter, the statement of three witnesses was recorded under Section 164, and later the court directed the Jaintapur Model Police Station to investigate the case further. In response to another question, he said that he himself prepared the Surathal report. When asked if there was any need for an autopsy, he avoided the issue. He said that if the relatives of the victim expressed their inability to perform the autopsy, the burial of the body was completed legally. He claimed that everything was done according to the law. When asked about the direct witness, he said, he submitted his final report based on what the witnesses said.

When the investigating officer of Jaintapur Model Police Station contacted SI Liton, he said, “I am very busy, so I cut the connection because it will not be possible to talk about it.”

When I contacted Highway Police Superintendent Mohammad Shahidullah over the phone, he said regarding the Surathal report, the doctors will tell the Thana police that a person has died, then the Thana police will prepare the Surathal report. The highway police will have nothing to do there. When he was asked about Ayani’s issue, he again changed his tone and said that the incident of the accident is true but due to doubt, the matter has been informed to the court. Meanwhile, he avoided the issue of autopsy. At one stage, when asked about the addition of the accused in the case, he could not give any confirmation. He said there will be no basis for the case.

Ali Haider said, “I can’t say anything without informing the plaintiff of the case.” Matshir Ali Rana said, it would be better to get you directly. He said that on the day the incident happened, Chiknagul market was on that day I went fishing. Suddenly I heard a scream. After 2-3 minutes I saw 4-5 people standing there and I saw sticks and pipes in their hands but I did not see anyone directly beating Ayani. In response to another question, he said that within these 2-3 minutes, another person named Ali Ahmed appeared at the scene. If you talk to him, you will get more details. He claimed that it was a planned murder. Speaking about it, Ali Ahmad said, I got the news of the road accident and went to the spot at least half an hour after the incident. I see many people there. At that time, the preparations for taking Ayani medically are almost at the last stage. At that time, he said, they had a dispute with Azad Khan. A two-day meeting was held to settle the dispute. The last sitting was scheduled for Friday but Ayani died on Thursday night. But it is believed that he was killed in a planned manner. When asked whether he had met any person who went fishing, he said, “No, I have not met any such person.” I went to the ground and saw Ayani being picked up in a car and being taken to the hospital. However, I came to know that an Ansar member of gas well No. 8 was there, but he was transferred after the incident. A lot of information can be obtained if you get him.

When talking to the plaintiff Nazmul Hossain on the phone to inquire about the case, he said, “First of all, we do not accept it as a road accident.” Later I filed a case in court on July 7th. He claimed that all proceedings of the case have been conducted in view of that application. After two months, the highway police submitted a final report stating that the killings had been confirmed. Accordingly, the case is ongoing.

When I contacted Hasina Begum, the wife of husband Taher Ali of Umanpur village of No. 6 Chiknagul Union, she said in a tearful voice, “We are very poor people.” A false murder case is being filed conspiratorially to harass our family relatives. Our houses were vandalized and an attempt was made to overthrow us. There is also a case against them in the court. He said most of the accused in the case are witnesses in the murder case. We are currently suffering from extreme insecurity. Meanwhile, he demanded the intervention of the higher authority of the administration for proper investigation of the medical report and the murder case.

Please Share This Post in Your Social Media